Advantages of the Grade Roofers & Flooring AS technology
Easy-to-calculate savings
We provide high expense and financial saving opportunities connected with the thermal insulation layer thanks to:
-
the optimization of thermal insulation and roof drainage design respecting the guidelines of the architectural and construction design, as well as
-
“module arrangement” methodology during the installation of thermal insulation panels and rolled waterproofing panels – directly on the roof.
thanks to precise prefabricated performance and the marking of panels according to the “module arrangement” methodology;
in Scandinavian countries, our roofs are usually assembled by two apt roofers irrespective of roof size thanks to:
- easy application of thermal insulation panels according to the simple “module arrangement” design – it is not necessary to form pitches on the roof – you simply arrange thermal insulation “modules” and there is no place where you could make a mistake;
- simple and quick application of the fixing/welding of roof felts or synthetic membranes as our pitches head straight towards roof drains and are unnoticeable while unfolding rolled waterproofing;
even several times – on the efficiency and speed of roofing works
up to 30% on the costs of hiring roofers
- easy application of thermal insulation panels according to the simple “puzzle arrangement” design – it is not necessary to form pitches on the roof – you simply arrange thermal insulation “puzzles” and there is no place where you could make a mistake;
- simple and quick application of the fixing/welding of roof felts or synthetic membranes as our pitches head straight towards roof drains and are unnoticeable while unfolding rolled waterproofing;
up to even 30% – on the number of thermal insulation panels applied
up to even 30% – on the number of applied rolled waterproofing materials (roof felt, PVC, TPO etc.)
up to even 25% – on the quantity of thermal insulation material waste
longer exploitation of the roof without previous intervention and exploitation risk of damaging waterproofing cover
Comparison of CIRCULATE PITCHES vs. traditional ones: the roof of 51,84 m²
One of large Scandinavian companies manufacturing thermal insulation roof panels conducted an interesting independent comparative experiment of the same “roof” in 3 different technologies of pitch panels commonly applied on the Scandinavian market.
Grade Roofers & Flooring AS team was invited to take part in the experiment as one of completely neutral observers. Grade Roofers & Flooring AS team did not take an active part in the project. The recording and summary under the form of a chart presenting the comparison of experiment results was prepared by an objective Organizer’s Team.
The experiment consisted in comparing for exactly the same roof the installation of 3 different technologies for the application of thermal insulation pitch panels and rolled roof felt waterproofing performed by the same professional roofers/experts possessing extensive experience and familiar with the technology thanks to their everyday work on Scandinavian roofs.
GRADEROOF CIRCULATE roof
Activity | Time |
---|---|
Planning | — |
Thermal panel | 7 min |
Roof felt | 4 min 30 s |
TOGETHER | 11 min 30 s |
Waste: thermal panel | — |
Waste: roof felt | — |
Welding | — |
TRADITIONAL 2-WAY roof
Activity | Time |
---|---|
Planning | 3 min 45 s |
Thermal panel | 21 min 15 s |
Roof felt | 12 min 45 s |
TOGETHER | 37 min 45 s |
Waste: thermal panel | — |
Waste: roof felt | 18 m² |
Welding | 2.5x longer |
TRADITIONAL 4-WAY roof
Activity | Time |
---|---|
Planning | 3 min 45 s |
Thermal panel | 43 min |
Roof felt | 18 min |
TOGETHER | 1 hour 4 min 25 s |
Waste: thermal panel | 30 m² |
Waste: roof felt | 25 m² |
Welding | 3x longer |